RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC INTERFACES IN THE FORMATION OF FORBIDDEN REFLECTIONS

PII
10.31857/S002347612370011X-1
DOI
10.31857/S002347612370011X
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 68 / Issue number 3
Pages
407-411
Abstract
The possibility of the existence of forbidden Bragg reflections in Mössbauer reflectivity, which are caused by the influence of interfaces on the mirror reflection, is demonstrated. The calculations show that the measurement of Mössbauer spectra using forbidden reflections provides a fundamental opportunity to study interfaces selectively.
Keywords
MAGNETIC INTERFACES FORBIDDEN REFLECTIONS
Date of publication
15.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
16

References

  1. 1. de Bergevin F., Brunel M. // Phys. Lett. A. 1972. V. 39. P. 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601 (72)91054-7
  2. 2. Gibbs D., Moncton D.E., D’Amico K.L. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985. V. 55. P. 234. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.234
  3. 3. Gibbs D., Grübel G., Harshman D.R. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 1991. V. 43. P. 5663. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.5663
  4. 4. Collins S.P., Laundy D., Dmitrienko V.E. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2003. V. 68. P. 064110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.064110
  5. 5. Beutier G., Collins S.P., Nisbet G. et al. // Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2012. V. 208. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01606-3
  6. 6. Collins S.P., Laundy D., Stunault A. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2001. V. 13. P. 1891. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/13/9/312
  7. 7. Dmitrienko V.E., Ovchinnikova E.N., Collins S.P. et al. // Nat. Phys. 2014. V. 10. P. 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2859
  8. 8. Beutier G., Collins S.P., Dimitrova O.V. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. V. 119. P. 167201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.167201
  9. 9. Андреева М.А., Кузьмин Р.Н. // Кристаллография. 1969. Т. 14. Вып. 4. С. 708.
  10. 10. Андреева М.А., Кузьмин Р.Н. // Докл. АН СССР. 1969. Т. 185. С. 1282.
  11. 11. Беляков В.А., Айвазян Ю.М. // Письма в ЖЭТФ. 1968. Т. 7. С. 477.
  12. 12. Беляков В.А. // Успехи физ. наук. 1987. Т. 151 С. 699. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0151.198704e.0699
  13. 13. Смирнов Г.В., Скляревский B.B., Восканян P.А., Артемьев А.Н. // Письма в ЖЭТФ. 1969. Т. 9. С.123.
  14. 14. Gerdau E., Rüffer R., Winkler H. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985. V. 54. P. 835. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.835
  15. 15. Smirnov G.V., van Bürck U., Chumakov A.I. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 1997. V. 55. P. 5811. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.5811
  16. 16. Mitsui T., Seto M., Hirao M. et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2007. V. 46. P. L382. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.46.L382
  17. 17. Mitsui T., Seto M., Masuda R. et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2007. V. 46. P. L703. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.46.L703
  18. 18. Mitsui T., SetoM., Masuda R. et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2007. V. 46. P. L930. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.46.L930
  19. 19. Potapkin V., Chumakov A.I., Smirnov G.V. et al. // J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2012. V. 19. P. 559. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049512015579
  20. 20. Andronova N.V., Kohn V.G., Chechin A.I. et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 1995. V. 359. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002 (94)01680-1
  21. 21. Kohn V.G. // Phys. Status Solidi. B. 1995. V. 187. P. 61. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221870105
  22. 22. Satapathy D.K., Uribe-Laverde M.A., Marozau I. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012. V. 108. P. 197201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.197201
  23. 23. Antropov N.O., Khaydukov Yu.N., Kravtsov E.A. et al. // JETP Lett. 2019. V. 109. P. 406. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364019060018
  24. 24. Andreeva M.A., Lindgren B. // Phys. Rev. B. 2005. V. 72. P. 125422. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.125422
  25. 25. Andreeva M.A. // Hyperfine Interact. 2008. V. 185. P. 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-008-9806-6
  26. 26. Andreeva M.A., Lindgren B., Panchuck V. // http://www.esrf.eu/Instrumentation/software/dataanalysis/OurSoftware/REFTIM-1
  27. 27. Toellner T.S., Sturhahn W., Rohlsberger R. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995. V. 74. P. 3475. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3475
  28. 28. Andreeva M., Gupta A., Sharma G. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2015. V. 92. P. 134403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.134403
  29. 29. Andreeva M.A., Baulin R.A., Chumakov A.I. et al. // J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2018. V. 25. P. 473. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577517017192
  30. 30. Baulin R.A., Andreeva M.A., Häggström L. et al. // Surf. Interfaces. 2021. V. 27. P. 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101521
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library