RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

Synthesis features of LiRF4 (R = Er–Lu) nanoparticles by the high-temperature co-precipitation method and their photoluminescent properties

PII
10.31857/S0023476124020168-1
DOI
10.31857/S0023476124020168
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 2
Pages
319-329
Abstract
Nanoparticles of LiRF4 (R = Y, Yb, Lu), activated with Yb3+/Er3+ and Yb3+/Tm3+ ions, were obtained by the high-temperature co-precipitation method. The influence of the precursor molar ratio and the cationic composition of matrices on their dimensionality and morphology was studied. A method for the heterogeneous crystallization of these compounds using LiYF4 nanoseeds was optimized, which opens up opportunities for controlled synthesis of LiRF4 nanoparticles with controllable characteristics. Among the studied objects, LiYF4@LiYbF4:Tm3+@LiYF4 nanoparticles demonstrate the most intense anti-Stokes photoluminescence in the UV (λ = 362 nm) and blue (λ = 450 nm) ranges, exceeding similar indicators for β-NaYF4:Yb3+/Tm3+@NaYF4 particles. LiYF4@LiLuF4:Yb3+/Er3+@LiYF4 nanoparticles are the most efficient converters of IR radiation in the λ = 1530 nm range among the investigated isostructural matrices and exhibit similar spectral-luminescent properties to the β-NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+@NaYF4 compound with an equivalent degree of codoping. The obtained results allow considering LiYF4@LiYbF4:Tm3+@LiYF4 and LiYF4@LiLuF4:Yb3+/Er3+@LiYF4 nanoparticles as a real alternative to the most widely used phosphors based on the hexagonal matrix β-NaYF4 for photonics and biotechnology applications.
Keywords
Date of publication
15.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
14

References

  1. 1. Combes C.M., Dorenbos P., Van Eijk C.W. et al. // J. Luminescence. 1997. V. 71. № 1. P. 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2313 (96)00118-4
  2. 2. Каминский А.А., Ляшенко А.И., Исаев Н.П. и др. // Квантовая электроника. 1998. Т. 25. № 3. С. 195.
  3. 3. Loiko P., Soulard R., Guillemot L. et al. // IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2019. V. 55. № 6. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2019.2943477
  4. 4. Yokota Y., Yamaji A., Kawaguchi N. et al. // Phys. Status Solidi. С. 2012. V. 9. № 12. P. 2279. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.201200290
  5. 5. Kamada K., Hishinuma K., Kurosawa S. et al. // Opt. Mater. 2016. V. 61. P. 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2016.09.019
  6. 6. Qiu Z., Wang S., Wang W., Wu S. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020. V. 12. № 26. P. 29835. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c07765
  7. 7. Vasyliev V., Villora E.G., Nakamura M. et al. // Opt. Express. 2012. V. 20. № 13. P. 14460. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.014460
  8. 8. Romanova I.V., Tagirov M.S. // Magnetic Resonance in Solids. Electronic J. 2019. V. 21. № 4. P. 13. https://doi.org/10.26907/mrsej-19412
  9. 9. Zelmon D.E., Erdman E.C., Stevens K.T. et al. // Appl. Opt. 2016. V. 55. № 4. P. 834. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.000834
  10. 10. Khaydukov E.V., Mironova K.E., Semchishen V.A. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 6. № 1. P. 35103. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35103
  11. 11. Hao S., Shang Y., Li D. et al. // Nanoscale. 2017. V. 9. № 20. P. 6711. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR01008G
  12. 12. Zheng K., Han S., Zeng X. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2018. V. 30. № 30. P. 1801726. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201801726
  13. 13. Guo Q., Wu J., Yang Y. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2019. V. 426. P. 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.039
  14. 14. Zhou Y., Wu S., Wang F. et al. // Chemosphere. 2020. V. 238. P. 124648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124648
  15. 15. Каримов Д.Н., Демина П.А., Кошелев А.В. и др. // Российские нанотехнологии. 2020. Т. 15. № 6. С. 699. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1992722320060114
  16. 16. Huang R., Liu S., Huang J. et al. // Nanoscale. 2021. V. 13. № 9. P. 4812. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR09068A
  17. 17. Yang Y., Huang J., Wei W. et al. // Nature Commun. 2022. V. 13. № 1. P. 3149. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30713-w
  18. 18. Федоров П.П. // Журн. неорган. химии. 1999 Т. 44. № 11. С. 1792.
  19. 19. Mai H.X., Zhang Y.W., Si R. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006. V. 128. № 19. P. 6426. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja060212h
  20. 20. Naccache R., Yu Q., Capobianco J.A. // Adv. Opt. Mater. 2015. V. 3. № 4. P. 482. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201400628
  21. 21. Wang J., Deng R., MacDonald M.A. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2014. V. 13. № 2. P. 157. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMAT3804
  22. 22. Rojas‐Gutierrez P.A., DeWolf C., Capobianco J.A. // Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2016. V. 33. № 12. P. 865. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201600218
  23. 23. Cheng T., Marin R., Skripka A., Vetrone F. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018. V. 140. № 40. P. 12890. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b07086
  24. 24. Wang J., Wang F., Xu J. et al. // C.R. Chim. 2010. V. 13. № 6–7. P. 731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2010.03.021
  25. 25. Liu S., An Z., Huang J., Zhou B. // Nano Res. 2023. V. 16. № 1. P. 1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-5121-9
  26. 26. Kaczmarek A.M., Suta M., Rijckaert H. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C. 2021. V. 9. № 10. P. 3589. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tc05865c
  27. 27. Zhang X., Wang M., Ding J. et al. // CrystEngComm. 2012. V. 14. № 24. P. 8357. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ce26159f
  28. 28. He E., Zheng H., Gao W. et al. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2013. V. 48. № 9. P. 3505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.05.046
  29. 29. Chen B., Wang F. // Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020. V. 7. № 5. P. 1067. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9QI01358J
  30. 30. Zhang L., Wang Z., Lu Z. et al. // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014. V. 14. № 6. P. 4710. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2014.8641
  31. 31. Jiang X., Cao C., Feng W. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. B. 2016. V. 4. № 1. P. 87. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb02023a
  32. 32. Carl F., Birk L., Grauel B. et al. // Nano Res. 2021. V. 14. P. 797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-3116-y
  33. 33. Gao W., Zheng H., He E. et al. // J. Luminescence. 2014. V. 152. P. 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.10.046
  34. 34. Li W., He Q., Xu J. et al. // J. Luminescence. 2020. V. 227. P. 117396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117396
  35. 35. Zou Q., Huang P., Zheng W. et al. // Nanoscale. 2017. V. 9. № 19. P. 6521. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR02124K
  36. 36. Liu J., Rijckaert H., Zeng M. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018. V. 28. № 17. P. 1707365. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201707365
  37. 37. Dong J., Zhang J., Han Q. et al. // J. Luminescence. 2019. V. 207. P. 361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2018.11.041
  38. 38. Wang F., Deng R., Liu X. // Nat. Protoc. 2014. V. 9. № 7. P. 1634. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.111
  39. 39. Boyer J.C., Cuccia L.A., Capobianco J.A. // Nano Lett. 2007. V. 7. № 3. P. 847. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl070235+
  40. 40. Koshelev A.V., Arkharova N.A., Khaydukov K.V. et al. // Crystals. 2022. V. 12. № 5. P. 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12050599
  41. 41. Wang F., Han Y., Lim C.S. et al. // Nature. 2010. V. 463. № 7284. P. 1061. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08777
  42. 42. Liu Q., Sun Y., Yang T. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011. V. 133. № 43. P. 17122. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207078s
  43. 43. Damasco J.A., Chen G., Shao W. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014. V. 6. № 16. P. 13884. https://doi.org/10.1021/am503288d
  44. 44. Huang X. // Opt. Mater. Express. 2016. V. 6. № 7. P. 2165. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.6.002165
  45. 45. Alyatkin S., Asharchuk I., Khaydukov K. et al. // Nanotechnology. 2016. V. 28. № 3. P. 035401. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/28/3/035401
  46. 46. Gao D., Zhang X., Chong B. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017. V. 19. № 6. P. 4288. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP06402G
  47. 47. Schroter A., Märkl S., Weitzel N., Hirsch T. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022. V. 32. № 26. P. 2113065. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202113065
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library