- PII
- 10.31857/S0023476124050069-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0023476124050069
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 69 / Issue number 5
- Pages
- 802-810
- Abstract
- The results of studying DNA-protein complexes using two independent structural methods – molecular dynamics (MD) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) – are compared. MD is a computational method that allows visualization of macromolecule behavior in real environmental conditions based on the laws of physics but suffers from numerous simplifications. SAXS is an X-ray method that allows the reconstruction of the three-dimensional structure of an object in solution based on the one-dimensional profile of small-angle scattering, which presents the problem of ambiguity in solving inverse problems. The use of structural characteristics of complexes obtained by the SAXS method for validating 3D structural models obtained in MD experiments has significantly reduced the ambivalence of theoretical predictions and demonstrated the effectiveness of combining MD and SAXS methods for solving structural biology problems.
- Keywords
- Date of publication
- 15.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 13
References
- 1. Feigin L.A., Svergun D.I. Structure analysis by small-angle x-ray and neutron scattering. New York: Plenum Press, 1987. 335 p.
- 2. Svergun D.I., Koch M.H., Timmins P.A. et al. Small Angle X-ray and Neutron Scattering from Solutions of Biological Macromolecules. London: Oxford University Press, 2013. 358 p.
- 3. Petrenko D.E., Timofeev V.I., Britikov V.V. et al. // Biology (Basel). 2021. V. 10. № 10. P. 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10101021
- 4. Bengtsen T., Holm V.L., Kjolbye L.R. et al. // Elife. 2020. V. 9. P. e56518. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56518
- 5. Gaponov Y.A., Timofeev V.I., Agapova Y.K. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2022. V. 32. № 6. P. 742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2022.11.011
- 6. Shtykova E.V., Petoukhov M.V., Mozhaev A.A. et al. // J. Biol. Chem. 2019. V. 294. № 47. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.010390
- 7. Kamyshinsky R., Chesnokov Y., Dadinova L. et al. // Biomolecules. 2020. V. 10. № 1. https://doi.org/Artn 3910.3390/Biom10010039
- 8. Larsen A.H., Wang Y., Bottaro S. et al. // PLoS Comput. Biol. 2020. V. 16. № 4. P. e1007870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007870
- 9. Timofeev V.I., Gaponov Y.A., Petrenko D.E. et al. // Crystals. 2023. V. 13. P. 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13121642
- 10. He W., Henning-Knechtel A., Kirmizialtin S. // Front. Bioinform. 2022. V. 2. P. 781949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2022.781949
- 11. Bhowmick T., Ghosh S., Dixit K. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2014. V. 5. P. 4124. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5124
- 12. Agapova Y.K., Altukhov D.A., Timofeev V.I. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2020. V. 10. № 1. P. 15128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72113-4
- 13. Altukhov D.A., Talyzina A.A., Agapova Y.K. et al. // J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2016. V. 36. № 1. P. 45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2016.1264893
- 14. Timofeev V.I., Altukhov D.A., Talyzina A.A. et al. // J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2018. V. 36. № 16. P. 4392. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2017.1417162
- 15. Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W.G. et al. // Acta Cryst. D. 2010. V. 66. Pt 4. P. 486. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493
- 16. Mouw K.W., Rice P.A. // Mol. Microbiol. 2007. V. 63. № 5. P. 1319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05586.x
- 17. Abraham M.J., Murtola T., Schulz R. et al. // SoftwareX. 2015. V. 1–2. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001
- 18. Voevodin V., Antonov A., Nikitenko D. et al. // Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations. 2019. V. 6. № 2. P. 4. https://doi.org/10.14529/jsfi190201
- 19. Lindorff-Larsen K., Piana S., Palmo K. et al. // Proteins. 2010. V. 78. № 8. P. 1950. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22711
- 20. Berendsen H.J.C., Postma J.P.M., van Gunsteren W.F. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1984. V. 81. № 8. P. 3684. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448118
- 21. Parrinello M., Rahman A. // J. Chem. Phys. 1982. V. 76. № 5. P. 2662. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443248
- 22. Hess B., Bekker H., Berendsen H.J.C. et al. // J. Comput. Chem. 1997. V. 18. № 12. P. 1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:123.0.CO;2-H
- 23. Roe D.R., Cheatham T.E. // J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013. V. 9. № 7. P. 3084. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400341p
- 24. Peters G.S., Zakharchenko O.A., Konarev P.V. et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2019. V. 945. P. 162616.
- 25. Peters G.S., Gaponov Y.A., Konarev P.V. et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2022. V. 1025. P. 166170.
- 26. Hammersley A.P. // J. Appl. Cryst. 2016. V. 49. № 2. P. 646.
- 27. Konarev P.V., Volkov V.V., Sokolova A.V. et al. // J. Appl. Cryst. 2003. V. 36. P. 1277. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889803012779
- 28. Guinier A., Fournet G. Small Angle Scattering of X-Rays. New York: Wiley, 1955. 268 p.
- 29. Porod G. // Small-angle X-ray scattering / Ed Glatter O., Kratky O. London: Academic Press, 1982. P. 17.
- 30. Petoukhov M.V., Franke D., Shkumatov A.V. et al. // J. Appl. Cryst. 2012. V. 45. № 2. P. 342. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812007662
- 31. Manalastas-Cantos K., Konarev P.V., Hajizadeh N.R. et al. // J. Appl. Cryst. 2021. V. 54. P. 343. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576720013412
- 32. Svergun D.I. // J. Appl. Cryst. 1992. V. 25. P. 495. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892001663
- 33. Svergun D.I., Nierhaus K.H. // J. Biol. Chem. 2000. V. 275. № 19. P. 14432.
- 34. Svergun D.I., Barberato C., Koch M.H.J. // J. Appl. Cryst. 1995. V. 28. P. 768. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889895007047
