Везде
Influence of the domain structure of LaBGeO₅ polar crystals on their gyrotropic properties
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Influence of the domain structure of LaBGeO₅ polar crystals on their gyrotropic properties
Annotation
PII
S0023476124030079-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. F. Konstantinova 
Affiliation: National University of Science and Technology MISIS
Edition
Volume 69 Issue number 3
Pages
429-437
Abstract
The spectra of transmission coefficients and absorption indices of monodomain and polydomain LaBGeO₅ samples were measured. It is shown that for a more accurate measurement of the rotation of the plane of polarization of light, it is necessary to use the transmission coefficient spectra not only for parallel and crossed polarizers, but also at other angles between them. The obtained values of p for both samples are described quite well by a single variance using the Drude formula. This is consistent with the fact that the value of p should not change with monodomenization of the crystal at a given symmetry (P31 in the ferroelectric phase and P3121 in the paraelectric phase). It is shown that the generation of the second harmonic of the Cherenkov type is observed only in a polydomain sample, while the radiation of the second harmonic is not polarized. The domain structure of the samples was observed by scanning electron microscopy and piezoelectric force microscopy. For a polydomain sample, the presence of a labyrinthine domain structure was shown, for a monodomain sample, no contrast changes were observed within the scanning area.
Acknowledgment
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, contract (FSME-2023-0003). State Health Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”.
Received
04.09.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
25
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Каминский А.А., Буташин А.В., Милль Б.В., Белоконева Е.Л. // Изв. АН СССР. Неорган. матер. 1990. Т. 26. № 5. C. 1105.

2. Стефанович С.Ю., Милль Б.В., Буташин А.В. // Кристаллография. 1992. Т. 37. Вып. 4. С. 965.

3. Belokoneva E.L., David W.I.F., Forsyth J.B., Knight K.S. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 1997. V. 9. P. 3503. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/9/17/002

4. Uesu У., Horiuchi N., Osakabe Е. et al. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1993. V. 62. Р. 2522. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.62.2522

5. Onodera А., Strukov В.А., Belov А.А. et al. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1993. V. 62. Р. 4311. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.62.4311

6. Милов Е.В., Струков Б.А. // ФТТ. 2001. Т. 43. С. 495.

7. Strukov В.А., Milov Е.Н., Milov V.N. et al. // Ferroelectrics. 2005. V. 314. Р. 105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190590926247

8. Akhmatkhanov A., Plashinnov C., Nebogatikov M. et al. // Crystals. 2020. V. 10. № 7. P. 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10070583

9. Kaminskii A.A., Butashin A.V., Maslyanitsin I.A. et al. // Phys. Status Solidi. A. 1991. V. 125. № 2. P. 671.

10. Kaminsky W. // Rep. Prog. Phys. 2000. V. 63. P. 1575. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/63/10/201

11. Каминский А.А., Нишиока Х., Уеда К. и др. // Квантовая электроника. 1996. Т. 23. № 5. С. 391.

12. Hirohashi J., Imai K., Watanabe S. et al. // Proc. SPIE10902, Nonlinear Frequency Generation and Conversion: Materials and Devices XVIII. 2019. P. 1090206. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2514795

13. Универсальная измерительная приставка Agilent Cary Universal Measurement Accessory (UMA) // Agilent Technologies. http://www.agilent.com/cs/library/technicaloverviews/public/5991-2529RU.pdf

14. Шубников А.В., Флинт Е.Е., Бокий Г.Б. Основы кристаллографии. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1940. 488 с.

15. Шубников А.В. Основы оптической кристаллографии. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1958. 207 с.

16. Константинова А.Ф., Гречушников Б.Н., Бокуть Б.В., Валяшко Е.Г. Оптические свойства кристаллов. Минск: Наука и техника, 1995. 302 с.

17. Golovina T.G., Konstantinova A.F., Dudka A.P. et al. // Crystallography Reports. 2023. V. 68. № 5. P. 732. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377452360045X

18. Кизель В.А., Бурков В.И. Гиротропия кристаллов. М.: Наука, 1980. 304 с.

19. Шувалов Л.А., Иванов Н.Р. // Кристаллография. 1964. Т. 9. Вып. 2. С. 363.

20. Головина Т.Г., Константинова А.Ф., Набатов Б.В., Евдищенко Е.А. // Кристаллография. 2018. Т. 63. № 6. С. 921. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0023476118060139

21. Ayoub M., Roedig P., Koynov K. et al. // Opt. Express. 2013. V. 21. № 7. P. 20117. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.008220

22. Sheng Y., Saltiel S.M., Krolikowski W. et al. // Opt. Lett. 2010. V. 35. № 9. P. 1317. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.001317

23. Sheng Y., Roppo V., Kalinowski Ks., Krolikowski W. // Opt. Lett. 2012. V. 37. № 18. P. 3864. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.003864

24. Roede E.D., Mosberg A.B., Evans D.M. et al. // APL Mater. 2021. V. 9. № 2. P. 021105. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038909

25. Kholkin A.L., Kalinin S.V., Roelofs A., Gruverman A. // Scanning Probe Microscopy. Electricaland Electromechanical Phenomena at the Nanoscale / Eds. Kalinin S.V., Gruverman A. New York: Springer, 2007. P. 173.

26. Калинин А.С. Методы атомно-силовой микроскопии для неразрушающего анализа электромеханических свойств наноструктур. Дис. … канд. физ.-мат. наук. М.: НИЦ КИ, 2017. 104 с.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate