RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

Computer simulation of AgI|Si3O6 complex nanocomposites in single-wall carbon nanotubes

PII
S0023476125010169-1
DOI
10.31857/S0023476125010169
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 1
Pages
119-125
Abstract
The method of molecular dynamics has been used to simulate heteronanostructures formed when silver iodide and silicon oxide nanoparticles are filling single-walled carbon nanotubes of the “armchair” type (12,12). The results of computer modeling show that stable nanostructured “internal nanocomposites” with AgI inclusions and silicon oxide clusters of various configurations can be formed in such tubes. Si3O6 clusters of linear and planar types have varying degrees of influence on the mobility of silver ions in the studied complex heteronanostructures of AgI|Si3O6@SWCNT.
Keywords
Date of publication
15.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
60

References

  1. 1. Mekuye B., Abera B. // Nano Select. 2023. V. 4. P. 486. https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.202300038
  2. 2. Baig N., Kammakakam I., Falath W. // Mater. Adv. 2021. V. 2. P. 1821. https://doi.org/ 10.1039/d0ma00807a
  3. 3. Saleh H.M., Hassan A.I. // Sustainability. 2023. V. 15. № 14. P. 10891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410891
  4. 4. Rizvi M., Gerengi H., Gupta P. // ACS Symp. Ser. 2022. V. 1418. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2022-1418.ch001
  5. 5. Rao R., Pint C.L., Islam A.E. et al. // ACS Nano. 2018. V. 12. P. 11756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b06511
  6. 6. Zhang Y., Rhee K.Y., Hui D. et al. // Compos. B. Eng. 2018. V. 143. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.028
  7. 7. Jadoun S., Chauhan N.P.S., Chinnam S. et al. // Biomedical Materials Devices. 2023. V. 1. P. 351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-022-00009-0
  8. 8. Barbaros I., Yang Y., Safaei B. et al. // Nanotechnol. Rev. 2022. V. 11. P. 321. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0017
  9. 9. Ilie A., Crampin S., Karlsson L., Wilson M. // Nano Res. 2012. V. 5. P. 833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-012-0267-5
  10. 10. Eatemadi M., Daraee H., Karimkhanloo H. et al. // Nanoscale Res. Let. 2014. V. 9. P. 393. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-393
  11. 11. Rakhi R.B. // Nanocarbon and its Composites / Eds. Khan A. et al. Woodhead Publishing, 2019. P. 489. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102509-3.00016-X
  12. 12. Sandoval S., Tobias G., Flahaut E. // Inorganica Chim. Acta. 2019. V. 492. P. 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2019.04.004
  13. 13. Ates M., Eker A.A., Eker B. // J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 2017. V. 31. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1295625
  14. 14. Poudel Y.R., Li W. // Mater. Today Phys. 2018. V. 7. P. 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2018.10.002
  15. 15. Kharlamova M.V., Kramberger C. // Nanomaterials. 2021. V. 11. P. 2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112863
  16. 16. Li L., Yang H., Zhou D. et al. // J. Nanomater. 2014. V. 2014. Art. 187891. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/187891
  17. 17. Nwanno C.E., Li W. // Nano Res. 2023. V. 16. P. 12384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-023-6006-2
  18. 18. Xiong J.Z., Yang Z.C., Guo X.L. et al. // Tungsten. 2024. V. 6. P. 174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42864-022-00177-y
  19. 19. Zhang D., Ye Z., Liu Z. et al. // Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2023. V. 12. P. 2095. https://doi.org/10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0178
  20. 20. Hou Z.-d., Gao Y.-y., Zhang Y. et al. // New Carbon Mater. 2023. V. 38. P. 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805 (23)60725-5
  21. 21. Thauer E., Ottmann A., Schneider P. et al. // Molecules. 2020. V. 25. P. 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051064
  22. 22. Babkin A.V., Kubarkov A.V., Drozhzhin O.A. et al. // Dokl. Chem. 2023. V. 508. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001250082360013X
  23. 23. Enyashin A.N. // Comput. Mater. Discovery. 2018. P. 352. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788010122-00352
  24. 24. Shunaev V.V., Petrunin A.A., Zhan H. et al. // Materials. 2023. V. 16. P. 3270. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16083270.
  25. 25. Zare Y., Yop Rhee K., Park S.-J. // Results Phys. 2019. V. 15. P. 102562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102562
  26. 26. Vivanco-Benavides L.E., Martínez-González C.L., Mercado-Zúñiga C. et al. // Comput. Mater. Sci. 2022. V. 201. P. 110939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110939
  27. 27. Eliseev A.A., Yashina L.V., Brzhezinskaya M.M. et al. // Carbon. 2010. V. 48. P. 2708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.02.037
  28. 28. Baldoni M., Leoni S., Sgamellott A.I. et al. // Small. 2007. V. 3. P. 1730. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200700296
  29. 29. Kumar S., Nehra M., Kedia D. et al. // Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2018. V. 64. P. 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.10.005
  30. 30. Готлиб И.Ю., Иванов-Шиц А.К., Мурин И.В. и др. // Неорган. матер. 2010. Т. 46. С. 1509.
  31. 31. Gotlib Yu., Ivanov-Schitz A.K., Murin I.V. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2011. V. 188. P. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2010.11.020
  32. 32. Готлиб И.Ю., Иванов-Шиц А.К., Мурин И.В. и др. // ФТТ. 2011. Т. 53. С. 2256.
  33. 33. Gotlib I.Yu., Ivanov-Schitz A.K., Murin I.V. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012. V. 116. P. 19554. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp305518t
  34. 34. Готлиб И.Ю., Иванов-Шиц А.К., Мурин И.В. и др. // ФТТ. 2014. Т. 56. № 7. С. 1420.
  35. 35. Уваров Н.Ф. Композиционные твердые электролиты. Новосибирск: Изд-во СО РАН. 2008. 258 с.
  36. 36. Petrov A.V., Salamatov M.S., Ivanov-Schitz A.K. et al. // Ionics. 2021. V. 27. P. 1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-020-03710-6
  37. 37. Петров А.В., Мурин И.В., Иванов-Шиц А.К. // Журн. общ. химии. 2017. Т. 87. C. 1062.
  38. 38. Mekky H. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3951310/v1
  39. 39. Rappé A.K., Casewit C.J., Colwell K.S. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992. V. 114. P. 10024. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00051a040
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library