Везде
Investigation of photonic curing mechanisms of sol-gel zinc oxide films for flexible electronics
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Investigation of photonic curing mechanisms of sol-gel zinc oxide films for flexible electronics
Annotation
PII
S0023476125010178-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
I. А. Pronin 
Affiliation: Penza State University
Edition
Volume 70 Issue number 1
Pages
126-132
Abstract
Photoannealing is a technological method that allows replacing the final high-temperature treatment of metal oxide sol-gel films with a combination of soft heating and ultraviolet irradiation. It has been established that an increase in temperature during heat treatment of the sol deposited on the substrate leads to the conversion of zinc acetate into layered basic zinc acetate (LBZA), which is transformed into hydroxide Zn(OH)2, which passes into amorphous oxide ZnO. It is shown that when heated to 130°C, parallel irradiation of films with UV radiation promotes the direct transition of LBZA into oxide due to the effective removal of hydroxyl and acetate groups. When the temperature is increased to 140°C, UV irradiation of films loses its expediency, since both photoannealing and heat treatment lead to identical properties of the studied materials.
Received
04.04.2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
21
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Korotcenkov G., Brinzari V., Schwank J. et al. // Sens. Actuators. B. 2001. V. 77. № 1–2. P. 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005 (01)00741-9

2. Waldman L.J., Haunert D.P., Carson J.D. et al. // ACS Omega. 2024. V. 9. № 27. P. 29732. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c03288

3. Ren X., Yang L., Cheng Q. et al. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2024. V. 35. № 3. P. 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-11949-2

4. Kumar B.B., Tiwari P.K., Dubey S. et al. // Micro Nanostructures. 2022. V. 164. P. 107122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2021.107122

5. Krishna M.S., Singh S., Batool M. et al. // Mater. Adv. 2023. V. 4. № 2. P. 320. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2MA00878E

6. Yakimets I., MacKerron D., Giesen P. et al. // Adv. Mater. Res. 2010. V. 93. P. 5. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.93-94.5

7. Lamanna L., Rizzi F., Guido F. et al. // Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019. V. 5. № 6. P. 1900095. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201900095

8. Kim Y.-H., Heo J.-S., Kim T.-H. et al. // Nature. 2012. V. 489. P. 128. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11434

9. Park J.W., Kang B.H., Kim H.J. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020. V. 30. № 20. P. 1904632. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201904632

10. Leppaniemi J., Eiroma K., Majumdar H. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017. V. 9. № 10. P. 8774. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b14654

11. Pronin I.A., Plugin I.A., Kolosov D.A. et al. // Sens. Actuators. A. 2024. V. 377. P. 115707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115707

12. Jaisutti R., Kim J., Park S.K. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016. V. 8. № 31. P. 20192. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b05724

13. Dong Z., Wang J., Men J. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2024. V. 63. № 12. P. 5709. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c00178

14. Subbiah A.S., Mathews N., Mhaisalkar S. et al. // ACS Energy. Lett. 2018. V. 3. № 7. P. 1482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00692

15. Lima A.H., Raeyani D., Sudmand S.A. et al. // Opt. Mater. 2024. V. 149. P. 115041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2024.115041

16. Hsu J.W., Piper R.T. // J. Phys. D. 2024. V. 57. № 25. P. 252001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad3560

17. John R.A., Chien N.A., Shukla S.et al. // Chem. Mater. 2016. V. 28. № 22. P. 8305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03499

18. Piper R.T., Xu W., Hsu J.W. // IEEE J. Photovolt. 2022. V. 12. № 3. P. 722. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3159395

19. Tauc J. Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors. Springer Science and Business Media, 2012. 441 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8705-7

20. Song R.Q., Xu A.W., Deng B. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007. V. 17. № 2. P. 296. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200600024

21. Wang Y., Li Y., Zhou Z. et al. // J. Nanoparticle Res. 2011. V. 13. P. 5193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0504-y

22. Hosono E., Fujihara S., Kimura T. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004. V. 272. № 2. P. 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2003.10.005

23. Holzwarth U., Gibson N. // Nature Nanotechnol. 2011. V. 6. № 9. P. 534. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.145

24. Coleman V.A., Jagadish C. // Zinc Oxide Bulk, Thin Films and Nanostructures. Elsevier Science Ltd, 2006. Р. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044722-3/50001-4

25. Pronin I.A., Averin I.A., Karmanov A.A et al. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. № 11. P. 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111924

26. Filippov I.A., Karmanov A.A., Yakushova N.D. et al. // Crystallography Reports. 2024. V. 69. № 7. Р. 1162. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377452460162X

27. Duchoslav J., Steinberger R., Arndt M. et al. // Corrosion Sci. 2014. V. 82. P. 356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.01.037

28. Liang M.K., Limo M.J., Sola-Rabada A. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2014. V. 26. № 14. P. 4119. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm501096p

29. Frankcombe T.J., Liu Y. // Chem. Mater. 2023. V. 35. № 14. P. 5468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c00801

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate