- PII
- S0023476125040099-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0023476125040099
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 70 / Issue number 4
- Pages
- 604-612
- Abstract
- Crystal structures of complexes of the mutant protein L254N carboxypeptidase T from with stable transition state analogues -N- sulfamoyl-L-glutamate, N-sulfamoyl-L-arginine, N-sulfamoyl-L-valine and N-sulfamoyl-L-leucine (resolution 2.05, 1.89, 2.30, 1.79 Å) were obtained. The dependence of the association constants of these inhibitors, as well as the efficiency of catalysis of the corresponding tripeptide substrates ZAAX, on the distances between the atoms of the ligand O15, O16, O20, T19 and the active center of the mutant protein N146, Y225 and E277 was found. This dependence differs significantly from the previously identified dependence for wild-type carboxypeptidase T. The results obtained indicate the involvement of leucine 254, which is part of the mobile loop of metallocarboxypeptidases, in the discrimination of substrates by carboxypeptidase T according to the induced fit mechanism.
- Keywords
- Date of publication
- 04.05.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 13
References
- 1. Song J.J., Hwang I., Cho K.H. et al. // J. Clin. Invest. 2011. V. 121. № 9. P. 3517. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI46387
- 2. Vendrell J., Querol E., Avilés F.X. // Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000. V. 1477. № 1-2. P. 248. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167483899002800
- 3. Estell D., Graycar T., Miller J. et al. // Science. 1986. V. 233. P. 659. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.233.4764.659
- 4. Wells J., Powers D., Bott R. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987. V. 84. № 5. P. 1219.
- 5. Hedstrom L., Szilágyi L., Rutter W.J. // Science. 1992. V. 255. P. 1249. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1546324
- 6. Hedstrom L., Farr-Jones S., Kettner C. et al. // Biochemistry. 1994. V. 33. № 29. P. 8764. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00195a018
- 7. Gul S., Pinitglang S., Thomas E. et al. // Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1998. V. 26. № 2. P. 171. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst026s171
- 8. Akparov V.Kh., Timofeev V.I., Konstantinova G.E. et al. // PLoS One. 2019. V. 14. № 12. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226636
- 9. Stepanov V.M. // Methods Enzymol. 1995. V. 248. P. 675. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879 (95)48044-7
- 10. Osterman A.L., Stepanov V.M., Rudenskaia G.N. et al. // Biokhimiia. 1984. V. 9. № 2. P. 292. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6424730
- 11. Grishin A.M., Akparov V.K., Chestukhina G.G. // Biochem. Moscow. 2008. V. 73. № 10. P. 1140. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0006297908100118
- 12. Akparov V.K., Grishin A.M., Yusupova M.P. et al. // Biochem. Moscow. 2007. V. 72. № 4. P. 416. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0006297907040086
- 13. Ho S.N., Hunt H.D., Horton R.M. et al. // Gene. 1989. V. 77. № 1. P. 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119 (89)90358-2
- 14. Cueni L.B., Bazzone T.J., Riordan J.F., Vallee B.L. // Anal. Biochem. 1980. V. 107. № 2. P. 341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697 (80)90394-2
- 15. Battye T., Kontogiannis L., Johnson O., Powell H. //Acta Cryst. D. 2011. V. 67. № 4. P. 271. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910048675
- 16. Rimsa V., Eadsforth T.C., Joosten R.P., Hunter W.N. // Acta Cryst. D. 2014. V. 70. № 2. P. 279. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1399004713026801
- 17. Murshudov G.N., Vagin A.A., Dodson E.J. // Acta Cryst. D. 1997. V. 53. № 3. P. 240. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444996012255
- 18. Emsley P., Cowtan K. // Acta Cryst. D. 2004. V. 60. № 12. P. 2126. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904019158
- 19. Pauling L. // Chem. Eng. News. 1946. V. 24. № 10. P. 1375. https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-v024n010.p1375
- 20. Wolfenden R. // Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1974. V. 3. № 3. P. 207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01686645
- 21. Akparov V., Timofeev V., Kuranova I., Khaliullin I. // Crystals. 2021. V. 11. № 9. P. 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11091088
