- PII
- 10.31857/S0023476123010101-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0023476123010101
- Publication type
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 68 / Issue number 2
- Pages
- 268-275
- Abstract
- Molecular dynamics simulations were performed for wild-type purine nucleoside phosphorylase in complexes with two substrates (adenosine and guanosine). The MD simulations were also performed for the mutant form of the enzyme with the same substrates. The free energy changes upon the formation of the complexes were evaluated from the molecular dynamics trajectories by the MM-GBSA method.
- Keywords
- MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS STUDY
- Date of publication
- 14.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 11
References
- 1. Timofeev V.I., Fateev I.V., Kostromina M.A. et al. // J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020. V. 40. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1848628
- 2. Tomoike F., Kuramitsu S., Masui R. // Extremophiles. 2013. V. 17. P. 505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-013-0535-7
- 3. Погосян Л.Г., Акопян Ж.И. // Биомедицинская химия. 2013. Т. 59. № 5. С. 483. https://doi.org/10.18097/pbmc20135905483
- 4. Salomon-Ferrer R., Case D.A., Walker R.C. // WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2013. V. 3. P. 198. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1121
- 5. Case D.A., Cheatham T.E., III, Darden T. et al. // J. Comput. Chem. 2005. V. 26. P. 1668. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20290
- 6. Maier J.A., Martinez C., Kasavajhala K. et al. // J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015. V. 11. P. 3696. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255
- 7. Salomon-Ferrer R., Goetz A.W., Poole D. et al. // J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013. V. 9. P. 3878. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400314y
- 8. Jorgensen W. L., Chandrasekhar J., Madura J.D. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1983. V. 79. P. 926. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869
- 9. Allen M.P., Tildesley D.J. Computer simulation of liquids. New York: Oxford university press, 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938686
- 10. Berendsen H.J.C., Postma J.P.M., van Gunsteren W.F. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1984. V. 81. P. 3684. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448118
- 11. Darden T., York D., Pedersen L. // J. Chem. Phys. 1993. V. 98. P. 10089. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464397
- 12. Kollman P.A., Massova I., Reyes C. et al. // Acc. Chem. Res. 2000. V. 33. P. 889. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar000033j
- 13. Srinivasan J., Trevathan M.W., Beroza P. et al. // Theor. Chem. Acc. 1999. V. 101. P. 426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002140050460
- 14. Miller B.R., McGee T.D., Swails J.M. et al. // J. Chemical Theory and Computation. 2012. V. 8. P. 3314. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300418h
- 15. Onufriev A., Bashford D., Case D.A. // Proteins. 2004. V. 55. P. 383. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20033
- 16. Schrödinger L.L.C. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0
- 17. Mikhailopulo I.A., Miroshnikov A.I. // Acta Naturae. 2010. V. 2. P. 36. https://doi.org/10.32607/20758251-2017-9-2-47-58
- 18. Fateev I.V., Kostromina M.A., Abramchik Y.A. et al. // Biomolecules. 2021. V. 11. P. 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11040586
- 19. Roy B., Depaix A., Périgaud C. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2016. V. 116. P. 7854. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00174
- 20. Almendros M., Berenguer J., Sinisterra J.V. // Appl. Environmental Microbiology. 2012. V. 78. P. 3128. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07605-11
- 21. Fateev I.V., Kharitonova M.I., Antonov K.V. et al. // Chemistry. 2015. V. 21. P. 13401. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201501334
