RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

Preliminary X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase from the Haloalkaliphilic Bacterium Halomonas chromatireducens

PII
10.31857/S0023476123600301-1
DOI
10.31857/S0023476123600301
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 68 / Issue number 6
Pages
922-925
Abstract
Crystals of the enzyme purine nucleoside phosphorylase from the extremophilic bacterium Halomonas Chromatireducens AGD 8-3, suitable for X-ray diffraction, were grown by the vapor-diffusion method. The X-ray diffraction data were collected from these crystals at the Belok beamline of the Kurchatov synchrotron radiation source (National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”) at 100 K to 1.80 Å resolution. The X-ray diffraction data were processed in the space groups P1, P2, P21, and P622. The structure was solved by the molecular replacement method taking into account the twinning in the space groups P21 and P1 with one and two hexamers of the enzyme per asymmetric unit, respectively.
Keywords
Date of publication
14.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Ealick S.E., Rule S.A., Carter D.C. et al. // J. Biol. Chem. 1990. V. 265. P. 1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258 (19)40090-2
  2. 2. Mao C., Cook W.J., Zhou M. et al. // Structure. 1997. V. 5. P. 1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126 (97)00287-6
  3. 3. Krenitsky T.A., Koszalka G.W., Tuttle J.V. // Biochemistry. 1981. V. 20 (12). P. 3615. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00515a048
  4. 4. Bennett E.M., Li C., Allan P.W. et al. // J. Biol. Chem. 2003. V. 278. P. 47110. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M304622200
  5. 5. Ducati R.G., Santos D.S., Basso L.A. // Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009. V. 486. P. 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2009.04.011
  6. 6. Михайлопуло И.А., Мирошников А.И. // Acta Naturae. 2010. Т. 2. № 2. С. 36. https://doi.org/10.32607/20758251-2010-2-2-36-58
  7. 7. Nannemann D.P., Kaufmann K.W., Meiler J. et al. // Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2010. V. 23. P. 607. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzq033
  8. 8. Xie X., Xia J., He K. et al. // Biotechnol. Lett. 2011. V. 33. P. 1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0535-6
  9. 9. Liekens S., De Clercq E., Neyts J. // Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001. V. 61. № 3. P. 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-2952 (00)00529-3
  10. 10. Carmeliet P. // Nature. 2005. V. 438. № 7070. P. 932. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04478
  11. 11. Furukawa T., Tabata S., Yamamoto M. et al. // Pharmacol. Res. 2018. V. 132. P. 15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2018.03.019
  12. 12. Pant P., Pathak A., Jayaram B. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2021. V. 125. P. 2856. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c10553
  13. 13. Madrid D.C., Ting L.-M., Waller K.L. et al. // J. Biol. Chem. 2008. V. 283. P. 35899. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M807218200
  14. 14. Myers L.A., Hershfield M.S., Neale W.T. et al. // J. Pediatr. 2004. V. 145. P. 710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.06.075
  15. 15. Погосян Л.Г., Нерсесова Л.С., Газарянц М.Г. и др. // Биомед. химия. 2011. Т. 57. № 5. С. 526. https://doi.org/10.18097/PBMC20115705526
  16. 16. Антипов А.Н., Мордкович Н.Н., Хижняк Т.В. и др. // Прикл. биохим. микробиол. 2020. Т. 56. № 1. С. 45. https://doi.org/10.31857/S055510992001002X
  17. 17. Шаповалова А.А., Хижняк Т.В., Турова Т.П. и др. // Микробиология. 2009. Т. 78. № 1. С. 117. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261709010135
  18. 18. Мордкович Н.Н., Манувера В.А., Вейко В.П. и др. // Биотехнология. 2012. № 1. С. 21.
  19. 19. Kabsch W. // Acta. Cryst. D. 2010. V. 66. P. 125. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909047337
  20. 20. Murshudov G.N., Skubák P., Lebedev A.A. et al. // Acta Cryst. D. 2011. V. 67. P. 355. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444911001314
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library