RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

Influence of the domain structure of LaBGeO₅ polar crystals on their gyrotropic properties

PII
10.31857/S0023476124030079-1
DOI
10.31857/S0023476124030079
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 3
Pages
429-437
Abstract
The spectra of transmission coefficients and absorption indices of monodomain and polydomain LaBGeO₅ samples were measured. It is shown that for a more accurate measurement of the rotation of the plane of polarization of light, it is necessary to use the transmission coefficient spectra not only for parallel and crossed polarizers, but also at other angles between them. The obtained values of p for both samples are described quite well by a single variance using the Drude formula. This is consistent with the fact that the value of p should not change with monodomenization of the crystal at a given symmetry (P31 in the ferroelectric phase and P3121 in the paraelectric phase). It is shown that the generation of the second harmonic of the Cherenkov type is observed only in a polydomain sample, while the radiation of the second harmonic is not polarized. The domain structure of the samples was observed by scanning electron microscopy and piezoelectric force microscopy. For a polydomain sample, the presence of a labyrinthine domain structure was shown, for a monodomain sample, no contrast changes were observed within the scanning area.
Keywords
Date of publication
15.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
73

References

  1. 1. Каминский А.А., Буташин А.В., Милль Б.В., Белоконева Е.Л. // Изв. АН СССР. Неорган. матер. 1990. Т. 26. № 5. C. 1105.
  2. 2. Стефанович С.Ю., Милль Б.В., Буташин А.В. // Кристаллография. 1992. Т. 37. Вып. 4. С. 965.
  3. 3. Belokoneva E.L., David W.I.F., Forsyth J.B., Knight K.S. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 1997. V. 9. P. 3503. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/9/17/002
  4. 4. Uesu У., Horiuchi N., Osakabe Е. et al. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1993. V. 62. Р. 2522. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.62.2522
  5. 5. Onodera А., Strukov В.А., Belov А.А. et al. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1993. V. 62. Р. 4311. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.62.4311
  6. 6. Милов Е.В., Струков Б.А. // ФТТ. 2001. Т. 43. С. 495.
  7. 7. Strukov В.А., Milov Е.Н., Milov V.N. et al. // Ferroelectrics. 2005. V. 314. Р. 105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190590926247
  8. 8. Akhmatkhanov A., Plashinnov C., Nebogatikov M. et al. // Crystals. 2020. V. 10. № 7. P. 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10070583
  9. 9. Kaminskii A.A., Butashin A.V., Maslyanitsin I.A. et al. // Phys. Status Solidi. A. 1991. V. 125. № 2. P. 671.
  10. 10. Kaminsky W. // Rep. Prog. Phys. 2000. V. 63. P. 1575. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/63/10/201
  11. 11. Каминский А.А., Нишиока Х., Уеда К. и др. // Квантовая электроника. 1996. Т. 23. № 5. С. 391.
  12. 12. Hirohashi J., Imai K., Watanabe S. et al. // Proc. SPIE10902, Nonlinear Frequency Generation and Conversion: Materials and Devices XVIII. 2019. P. 1090206. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2514795
  13. 13. Универсальная измерительная приставка Agilent Cary Universal Measurement Accessory (UMA) // Agilent Technologies. http://www.agilent.com/cs/library/technicaloverviews/public/5991-2529RU.pdf
  14. 14. Шубников А.В., Флинт Е.Е., Бокий Г.Б. Основы кристаллографии. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1940. 488 с.
  15. 15. Шубников А.В. Основы оптической кристаллографии. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1958. 207 с.
  16. 16. Константинова А.Ф., Гречушников Б.Н., Бокуть Б.В., Валяшко Е.Г. Оптические свойства кристаллов. Минск: Наука и техника, 1995. 302 с.
  17. 17. Golovina T.G., Konstantinova A.F., Dudka A.P. et al. // Crystallography Reports. 2023. V. 68. № 5. P. 732. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377452360045X
  18. 18. Кизель В.А., Бурков В.И. Гиротропия кристаллов. М.: Наука, 1980. 304 с.
  19. 19. Шувалов Л.А., Иванов Н.Р. // Кристаллография. 1964. Т. 9. Вып. 2. С. 363.
  20. 20. Головина Т.Г., Константинова А.Ф., Набатов Б.В., Евдищенко Е.А. // Кристаллография. 2018. Т. 63. № 6. С. 921. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0023476118060139
  21. 21. Ayoub M., Roedig P., Koynov K. et al. // Opt. Express. 2013. V. 21. № 7. P. 20117. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.008220
  22. 22. Sheng Y., Saltiel S.M., Krolikowski W. et al. // Opt. Lett. 2010. V. 35. № 9. P. 1317. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.001317
  23. 23. Sheng Y., Roppo V., Kalinowski Ks., Krolikowski W. // Opt. Lett. 2012. V. 37. № 18. P. 3864. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.003864
  24. 24. Roede E.D., Mosberg A.B., Evans D.M. et al. // APL Mater. 2021. V. 9. № 2. P. 021105. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038909
  25. 25. Kholkin A.L., Kalinin S.V., Roelofs A., Gruverman A. // Scanning Probe Microscopy. Electricaland Electromechanical Phenomena at the Nanoscale / Eds. Kalinin S.V., Gruverman A. New York: Springer, 2007. P. 173.
  26. 26. Калинин А.С. Методы атомно-силовой микроскопии для неразрушающего анализа электромеханических свойств наноструктур. Дис. … канд. физ.-мат. наук. М.: НИЦ КИ, 2017. 104 с.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library