RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

Protein of unknown function from variovorax paradoxus with amino acid substitution n174k is able to form schiff base with plp molecule

PII
10.31857/S0023476124060075-1
DOI
10.31857/S0023476124060075
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 6
Pages
981-986
Abstract
Pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes are one of the most widely represented groups of enzymes in organisms, performing more than 150 different catalytic functions. Based on the three-dimensional structure, members of this group are divided into seven (I-VII) different fold types. Cofactor binding in these enzymes occurs due to the formation of a Schiff base with a conserved lysine residue located in the active site. A recently discovered protein from the bacterium Variovorax paradoxus (VAPA), which belongs to the IV fold type and has significant structural similarity to transaminases, contains an asparagine residue at the catalytic lysine position in the transaminases and, as a result, cannot form a Schiff base with PLP and does not have aminotransferase activity. In this research, a point mutant of VAPA protein with the N174K substitution was obtained and its 3D structure was determined. Analysis of the structural data showed that the introduced mutation restores the ability of VAPAN174K to form a Schiff base with a cofactor.
Keywords
Date of publication
15.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
14

References

  1. 1. Boyko K.M., Matyuta I.O., Nikolaeva A.Y. et al. // Crystals. 2022. V. 12. P. 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12050619
  2. 2. Christen P., Mehta P.K. // Chem. Rec. 2001. V. 1. P. 436. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.10005
  3. 3. Bezsudnova E.Y., Popov V.O., Boyko K.M. // Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020. V. 104. P. 2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10369-6
  4. 4. Catazaro J., Caprez A., Guru A. et al. // Proteins. 2014. V. 82. P. 2597. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.24624
  5. 5. Bezsudnova E.Y., Boyko K.M., Popov V.O. // Biochemistry (Moscow). 2017. V. 82. P. 1572. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297917130028
  6. 6. Bezsudnova E.Y., Dibrova D.V., Nikolaeva A.Y. et al. // J. Biotechnol. 2018. V. 271. P. 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.02.005
  7. 7. Liang J., Han Q., Tan Y. et al. // Front. Mol. Biosci. 2019. V. 6. P. 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2019.00004
  8. 8. Cook P.D., Thoden J.B., Holden H.M. // Protein Sci. 2006. V. 15. P. 2093. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.062328306
  9. 9. Evans P.R., Murshudov G.N. // Acta Cryst. D. 2013. V. 69. P. 1204. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444913000061
  10. 10. Vagin A., Teplyakov A. // J. Appl. Cryst. 1997. V. 30. P. 1022. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889897006766
  11. 11. Collaborative Computational Project // Acta Cryst. D. 1994. V. 50. P. 760. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444994003112
  12. 12. Murshudov G.N., Skubak P., Lebedev A.A. et al. // Acta Cryst. D. 2011. V. 67. P. 355. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444911001314
  13. 13. Emsley P., Cowtan K. // Acta Cryst. D. 2004. V. 60. P. 2126. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904019158
  14. 14. Wallace A.C., Laskowski R.A., Thornton J.M. // Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 1995. V. 8. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/8.2.127
  15. 15. Dai Y.N., Chi C.B., Zhou K. et al. // J. Biol. Chem. 2013. V. 288. P. 22985. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.480335
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library