Simulation of ZnWO<sub>4</sub> sanmartinite by the method of interatomic potentials
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Simulation of ZnWO<sub>4</sub> sanmartinite by the method of interatomic potentials
Annotation
PII
S0023476125010012-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
V. В. Dudnikova 
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry (IGEM RAS)
Pages
3-9
Abstract
The structure and properties of ZnWO4 have been simulated using the method of empirical interatomic potentials. The system of consistent interatomic potentials has been developed, which makes it possible to describe the structure, elastic and thermodynamic properties of zinc tungstate and provide the simulation of more complex composite media involving this component.
Acknowledgment
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (124022400142-2). Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (АААА-А16-116033010121-7).
Received
03.04.2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
17
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Kroeger E.A. // Some Aspects of the Luminescence of Solids. New York: Elsevier, 1948. P. 107.

2. Degoda V.Ya., Afanasieva L.A., Belli P. et al. // J. Lumin. 2022. V. 249. 119028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2022.119028

3. Nagornaya L.L., Dubovik A.M., Vostretsov Y.Y. // IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2008. V. 55. P. 1469. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2007.910974

4. Galashov E.N., Gusev V.A., Shlegel V.N., Vasiliev Ya.V. // Crystallography Reports. 2009. V. 54. P. 689. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774509040245

5. Leng X., Dai L., Chao X. et al. // Optik. 2014. V. 125. P. 1267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.08.033

6. Atuchin V.V., Bekenev V.L., Borovlev Yu.A. et al. // J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2017. V. 19. P. 86.

7. Barabash A.S., Belli P., Bernabei R. et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2016. V. 833. P. 77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.07.025

8. Belli P., Bernabei R., Borovlev Y.A. et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2022. V. 1029. 166400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.166400

9. Grassmann H., Moser H.G. // J. Lumin. 1985. V. 33. P. 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2313 (85)90034-1

10. Dkhilalli F., Borchani S.M., Rasheed M. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2018. V. 29. P. 6297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8609-z

11. Jeong H.Y., Lim H.S., Lee J.H. // Nanomaterials. 2020. V. 10. P. 1721. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10091721

12. De Macedo O.B., de Oliveira A.L.M., dos Santos I.M.G. // Ceramica. 2022. V. 68. P. 294. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7930-6234

13. Lou Z., Hao J., Cocivera M. // J. Lumin. 2002. V. 99. P. 349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2313 (02)00372-1

14. Bernabei R., Belli P., Cappella F. et al. // EPJ Web Conf. 2017. V. 136. 05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201713605002

15. Caracciolo V., Degoda V.Ya., Belli P. et al. // SciPost Phys. Proc. 2023. V. 12. P. 021. https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.12.021

16. Wang X., Fan Z., Yu H. et al. // Opt. Mater. Express. 2017. V. 7. P. 1732. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.7.001732

17. Xia Z., Yang F., Qiao L., Yan F. // Opt. Commun. 2017. V. 387. P. 357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.12.008

18. Subbotin K., Loiko P., Volokitina A. et al. // J. Lumin. 2020. V. 228. 117601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117601

19. Chen X.P., Xiao F., Ye S. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2011. V. 509. P. 1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.061

20. Ran W., Wang Q., Zhou Y. et al. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2015. V. 64. P. 146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.12.050

21. Филипенко О.С., Победимская Е.А., Белов Н.В. // Кристаллография. 1968. Т. 13. С. 163.

22. Trots D.M., Senyshyn A., Vasylechko L. et al. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2009. V. 21. 325402. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/32/325402

23. Brik M.G., Nagirnyi V., Kirm M. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013. V. 137. P. 977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.11.011

24. Zhang X.Q., Zhang B. // Rus. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. P. 1049. http://dx.doi.org/0.1134/S1990793123050135

25. Errandonea D., Manjón F.J., Garro N. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2008. V. 78. 054116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.054116

26. Evarestov R., Kalinko A., Kuzmin A. et al. // Integr. Ferroelectr. 2009. V. 108. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584580903323990

27. Kohn W., Sham L.J. // Phys. Rev. 1965. V. 140. P. A1133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133

28. Perdew J.P., Chevary J.A., Vosko S.H. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 1992. V. 46. P. 6671. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671

29. Perdew J.P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996. V. 77. P. 3865. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

30. Senyshyn A., Kraus H., Mikhailik V.B., Yakovyna V. // Phys. Rev. B. 2004. V. 70. 214306. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.214306

31. Дудникова В.Б., Жариков Е.В. // ФТТ. 2017. T. 59. C. 847. http://dx.doi.org/10.21883/FTT.2017.05.44370.359

32. Lin Q., Feng X // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2003. V. 15. P. 1963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/15/12/313

33. Dudnikova V.B., Zharikov E.V., Eremin N.N. // Mater. Today Commun. 2020. V. 23. 101180. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101180

34. Shao Z., Zhang Q., Liu T., Chen J. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2008. V. 266. P. 797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.01.018

35. Дудникова В.Б., Антонов Д.И., Жариков Е.В., Еремин Н.Н. // ФТТ. 2022. Т. 64. С. 1741. http://dx.doi.org/10.21883/FTT.2022.11.53328.413

36. Huang H., Liu L., Tian N., Zhang Y. // J. Alloys Compd. 2015. V. 637. P. 471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.224

37. Tang L., Zhu M., Chen W. et al. // New J. Chem. 2020. V. 44. P. 19796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0nj04622a

38. Malyukin Y., Seminko V., Maksimchuk P., Bespalova I. // Opt. Mater. 2019. V. 98. 109455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109455

39. Krutyak N., Nagirnyi V., Zadneprovski B., Buriy M. // J. Lumin. 2024. V. 267. 120356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2023.120356

40. Gale J.D. // Z. Kristallogr. 2005. V. 220. P. 552. https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.220.5.552.65070

41. Урусов В.С., Еремин Н.Н. Атомистическое компьютерное моделирование структуры и свойств неорганических кристаллов и минералов, их дефектов и твердых растворов. М: ГЕОС, 2012. 428 c.

42. Scofield P.F., Knight K.S., Redfern S.A.T., Cressey G. // Acta Cryst. B. 1997. V. 53. P. 102. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767396008446

43. Dahlborg M.A., Svensson G. // Acta Chem. Scandinavica. 1999. V. 53. P. 1103. https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.53-1103

44. Redfern S.A.T., Bell A.M.T., Henderson C.M.B. et al. // Eur. J. Mineral. 1995. V. 7. P. 1019. https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/7/4/1019

45. Kuzmin A., Purans J. // Radiat. Measur. 2001. V. 33. P. 583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487 (01)00063-4

46. Yadav P., Rout S.K., Sinha E. // J. Alloys Compd. 2017. V. 726. P. 1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.308

47. Pisarevskii Yu.V., Silvestrova I.M., Voszka R. et al. // Phys. Status Solidi. A. 1988. V. 107. P. 161. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2211070115

48. Ruiz-Fuertes J., Lopez-Moreno S., Errandonea D. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2010. V. 107. 083506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3380848

49. Ma L., Yibibulla T., Jiang Y. et al. // Physica E. 2022. V. 136. 114990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2021.114990

50. Lyon W.G., Westrum Jr. E.F. // J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1974. V. 6. P. 763. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9614 (74)90141-4

51. Landee C.P., Westrum Jr. E.F. // J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1975. V. 7. P. 973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9614 (75)90161-5

52. Попов П.А., Скробов С.А., Матовников А.В. и др. // ФТТ. 2016. T. 58. C. 827.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate