Везде
Phase transitions in poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based composite under mechanical stresses
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Phase transitions in poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based composite under mechanical stresses
Annotation
PII
S0023476125010046-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
P. А. Vorontsov 
Affiliation: Kant Baltic Federal University
Edition
Volume 70 Issue number 1
Pages
28-34
Abstract
In this work the phase transition in composites based on polyvinylidene fluoride and cobalt ferrite nanoparticles under uniaxial stretching at 100, 200 and 300% is investigated. It was found that when the composite is stretched at 300%, there is a maximum increase in the β-phase fraction from 1% for the unstretched sample to 91%, while the electroactive phase increases from 74 to 92%. It was also found that tensile stretching of the composites leads to an increase in tensile strength: from 5.7 to 85.0 MPa. This tensile pattern also contributes to an increase in coercivity, which is due to the increase in the interparticle distance in the composite structure. These results emphasise the importance of mechanical properties and phase changes in polymer composites containing ferrites for their future applications.
Received
03.04.2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
17
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Saxena P., Shukla P. // Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2021. V. 4. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00217-0

2. Dallaev R., Pisarenko T., Sobola D. et al. // Polymers (Basel). 2022. V. 14. № 22. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224793

3. Su Y.P., Sim L.N., Li X. et al. // J. Memb. Sci. 2021. V. 620. P. 118818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118818

4. Bichurin M., Petrov R., Sokolov O. et al. // Sensors. 2021. V. 21. № 18. P. 6232. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186232

5. Narita F., Fox M. // Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018. V. 20. № 5. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700743

6. Alibakhshi H., Esfahani H., Sharifi E. // Ceram. Int. 2024. V. 50. № 5. P. 8017. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272884223040506

7. Liu F., Hashim N.A., Liu Y., Abed R. // J. Memb. Sci. 2011. V. 375. № 1–2. P. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014

8. Lovinger A.J. // Science. 1983. V. 220. № 4602. P. 1115. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4602.1115

9. Pereira N., Lima A., Lanceros-Mendez S., Martins P. // Materials. 2020. V. 13. № 18. P. 4033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13184033

10. Omelyanchik A., Antipova V., Gritsenko Ch. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2021. V. 11. № 5. P. 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051154

11. Antipova V., Omelyanchik A., Sobolev K. et al. // Nanobiotechnology Reports. 2023. V. 18. Suppl. 1. P. S186. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2635167623600967

12. Koç M., Demirci C., Parali L. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022. V. 33. № 10. P. 8048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-07956-w

13. Cozza E.S., Monticelli O., Marsano E., Cebe P. // Polym. Int. 2013. V. 62. № 1. P. 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pi.4314

14. Sharma M., Madras G., Bose S. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 16. № 28. P. 14792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01004c

15. Chen B., Yuan M., Ma R. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2022. V. 433. P. 134475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134475

16. Jovanović S., Spreitzer M., Otoničar M. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2014. V. 589. P. 271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.217

17. Botvin V., Fetisova A., Mukhortova Y. et al. // Polymers. 2023. V. 15. № 14. P. 3135. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15143135

18. Terzić I., Meereboer N.L., Mellema H.H. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C. 2019. V. 7. № 4. P. 968. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC05017A

19. Ribeiro C., Costa C., Correia D. et al. // Nat. Protoc. 2018. V. 13. № 4. P. 681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.157

20. Sayyar S., Aslibeiki B., Asgari A. // Phys. Appl. Mater. 2022. V. 2. P. 165. https://doi.org/10.22075/ppam.2022.29079.1047

21. Stoner B., Wohlfarth P.A. // Phys. Dep. 1948. V. 250. № 826. P. 599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.0007

22. Salnikov V.D., Aga-Tagieva S., Kolesnikova V. et al. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2024. V. 595. P. 171498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171498

23. Zhang L., Li S., Zhu Z. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023. V. 33. № 38. P. 2301302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202301302

24. Satapathy S., Pawar S., Gupta P.K., Varma K. // Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011. V. 34. № 4. P. 727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12034-011-0187-0

25. Cai X., Lei T., Sun D., Lin L. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. № 25. P. 15382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01267E

26. Peters A., Candau S.J. // Macromolecules. 1986. V. 19. P. 1952. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00161a029

27. Developments in Crystalline Polymers – 1. / Ed. Bassett D.C. Dordrecht: Springer, 1982. 279 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7343-5

28. Salimi A., Yousefi A.A. // J. Polym. Sci. B. Polym. Phys. 2004. V. 42. № 18. P. 3487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.20223

29. Orudzhev F., Ramazanov S., Sobola D. et al. // Nano Energy. B. 2021. V. 90. P. 106586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106586

30. Silva M.P., Costa C.M., Sencadas V. et al. // J. Polym. Res. 2011. V. 18. № 6. P. 1451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10965-010-9550-x

31. Keshmirizadeh E., Modarress H., Eliassi A., Mansoori G.A. // Eur. Polym. J. 2003. V. 39. № 6. P. 1141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057 (02)00373-7

32. Miri V., Persyn O., Seguela R., Lefebvre J.M. // Eur. Polym. J. 2011. V. 47. № 1. P. 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.09.006

33. Zhou Y., Liu W., Tan B. et al. // Polymers. 2021. V. 13. № 7. P. 998. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13070998

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate