RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

Atomistic simulation of paratellurite α-TeO2 crystal. III. Anisotropy of ion transport under externally applied electric fields

PII
S0023476125010093-1
DOI
10.31857/S0023476125010093
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 1
Pages
68-72
Abstract
The features of ion transfer in α-TeO2 paratellurite crystals under conditions of an external constant electric field have been studied by the method of molecular dynamics. It is shown that the anisotropy of ion transport is more pronounced when the E field is applied along the c axis: at E = 350 kV/mm, diffusion increases by about 2 times for crystals with oxygen vacancies and 3 times for samples with additional interstitial oxygen atoms.
Keywords
Date of publication
15.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
61

References

  1. 1. Кондратюк И.П., Мурадян Л.А., Писаревский Ю.В., Симонов В.И. // Кристаллография. 1987. Т. 32. Вып. 3. С. 609.
  2. 2. Thomas P.A. // J. Phys. C. 1988. V. 21. P. 4611. http://stacks.iop.org/0022-3719/21/i=25/a=009
  3. 3. Arlt G., Schweppe H. // Solid State Commun. 1968. V. 6. P. 783. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038–1098 (68)90119-1
  4. 4. Uchida N. // Phys. Rev. B. 1971. V. 4. P. 3736.
  5. 5. Беляев Л.М., Бурков В.И., Гильварг А.Б. и др. // Кристаллография. 1975. Т. 20. Вып. 6. С. 1221.
  6. 6. Кизель В.А., Бурков В.И. Гиротропия кристаллов. М.: Наука, 1980. 304 с.
  7. 7. Акустические кристаллы. Справочник. Под. ред. Шаскольской М.П. М.: Наука, 1982. 632 с.
  8. 8. Wang P., Zhang Z. // Appl. Opt. 2017. V. 56. P. 1647. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.001647
  9. 9. Ковальчук М.В., Благов А.Е., Куликов А.Г. и др. // Кристаллография. 2014. Т. 59. С. 950. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0023476114060149
  10. 10. Куликов А.Г., Благов А.Е., Марченков Н.В. и др. // Письма в ЖЭТФ. 2018. Т. 107. С. 679. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0370274X18100119
  11. 11. Kulikov A.G., Blagov A.E., Ilin A.S. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2020. V. 127. P. 065106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5131369
  12. 12. Иванов-Шиц А.К. // Кристаллография. 2024. Т. 69. № 6. С. 1009. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023476124060116
  13. 13. Иванов-Шиц А.К. // Кристаллография. 2025. Т. 70. № 1. С. 62. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023476125010089
  14. 14. Smith W., Todorov I.T., Leslie M. // Z. Kristallogr. 2005. B. 220. S. 563. https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.220.5.563.65076
  15. 15. English N.J., Waldron C.J. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015. V. 17. P. 12407. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp00629e
  16. 16. English N.J. // Crystals. 2021. V. 11. P. 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11111405
  17. 17. Jain H., Nowick A. S. // Phys. Status Solidi. A. 1981. V. 67. P. 701. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210670242
  18. 18. Wegener J., Kanert O., Küchler R. et al. // Z. Naturforsch. A. 1994. V. 49. P. 1151. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1994-1208
  19. 19. Wegener J., Kanert O., Küchler R. et al. // Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids. 1995. V. 114. P. 277.
  20. 20. Hartmann E., Kovács L. // Phys. Status Solidi. A. 1982. V. 74. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210740105
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library