RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

Investigation of photonic curing mechanisms of sol-gel zinc oxide films for flexible electronics

PII
S0023476125010178-1
DOI
10.31857/S0023476125010178
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 1
Pages
126-132
Abstract
Photoannealing is a technological method that allows replacing the final high-temperature treatment of metal oxide sol-gel films with a combination of soft heating and ultraviolet irradiation. It has been established that an increase in temperature during heat treatment of the sol deposited on the substrate leads to the conversion of zinc acetate into layered basic zinc acetate (LBZA), which is transformed into hydroxide Zn(OH)2, which passes into amorphous oxide ZnO. It is shown that when heated to 130°C, parallel irradiation of films with UV radiation promotes the direct transition of LBZA into oxide due to the effective removal of hydroxyl and acetate groups. When the temperature is increased to 140°C, UV irradiation of films loses its expediency, since both photoannealing and heat treatment lead to identical properties of the studied materials.
Keywords
Date of publication
14.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
74

References

  1. 1. Korotcenkov G., Brinzari V., Schwank J. et al. // Sens. Actuators. B. 2001. V. 77. № 1–2. P. 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005 (01)00741-9
  2. 2. Waldman L.J., Haunert D.P., Carson J.D. et al. // ACS Omega. 2024. V. 9. № 27. P. 29732. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c03288
  3. 3. Ren X., Yang L., Cheng Q. et al. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2024. V. 35. № 3. P. 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-11949-2
  4. 4. Kumar B.B., Tiwari P.K., Dubey S. et al. // Micro Nanostructures. 2022. V. 164. P. 107122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2021.107122
  5. 5. Krishna M.S., Singh S., Batool M. et al. // Mater. Adv. 2023. V. 4. № 2. P. 320. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2MA00878E
  6. 6. Yakimets I., MacKerron D., Giesen P. et al. // Adv. Mater. Res. 2010. V. 93. P. 5. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.93-94.5
  7. 7. Lamanna L., Rizzi F., Guido F. et al. // Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019. V. 5. № 6. P. 1900095. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201900095
  8. 8. Kim Y.-H., Heo J.-S., Kim T.-H. et al. // Nature. 2012. V. 489. P. 128. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11434
  9. 9. Park J.W., Kang B.H., Kim H.J. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020. V. 30. № 20. P. 1904632. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201904632
  10. 10. Leppaniemi J., Eiroma K., Majumdar H. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017. V. 9. № 10. P. 8774. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b14654
  11. 11. Pronin I.A., Plugin I.A., Kolosov D.A. et al. // Sens. Actuators. A. 2024. V. 377. P. 115707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115707
  12. 12. Jaisutti R., Kim J., Park S.K. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016. V. 8. № 31. P. 20192. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b05724
  13. 13. Dong Z., Wang J., Men J. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2024. V. 63. № 12. P. 5709. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c00178
  14. 14. Subbiah A.S., Mathews N., Mhaisalkar S. et al. // ACS Energy. Lett. 2018. V. 3. № 7. P. 1482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00692
  15. 15. Lima A.H., Raeyani D., Sudmand S.A. et al. // Opt. Mater. 2024. V. 149. P. 115041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2024.115041
  16. 16. Hsu J.W., Piper R.T. // J. Phys. D. 2024. V. 57. № 25. P. 252001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad3560
  17. 17. John R.A., Chien N.A., Shukla S.et al. // Chem. Mater. 2016. V. 28. № 22. P. 8305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03499
  18. 18. Piper R.T., Xu W., Hsu J.W. // IEEE J. Photovolt. 2022. V. 12. № 3. P. 722. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3159395
  19. 19. Tauc J. Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors. Springer Science and Business Media, 2012. 441 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8705-7
  20. 20. Song R.Q., Xu A.W., Deng B. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007. V. 17. № 2. P. 296. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200600024
  21. 21. Wang Y., Li Y., Zhou Z. et al. // J. Nanoparticle Res. 2011. V. 13. P. 5193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0504-y
  22. 22. Hosono E., Fujihara S., Kimura T. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004. V. 272. № 2. P. 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2003.10.005
  23. 23. Holzwarth U., Gibson N. // Nature Nanotechnol. 2011. V. 6. № 9. P. 534. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.145
  24. 24. Coleman V.A., Jagadish C. // Zinc Oxide Bulk, Thin Films and Nanostructures. Elsevier Science Ltd, 2006. Р. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044722-3/50001-4
  25. 25. Pronin I.A., Averin I.A., Karmanov A.A et al. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. № 11. P. 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111924
  26. 26. Filippov I.A., Karmanov A.A., Yakushova N.D. et al. // Crystallography Reports. 2024. V. 69. № 7. Р. 1162. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377452460162X
  27. 27. Duchoslav J., Steinberger R., Arndt M. et al. // Corrosion Sci. 2014. V. 82. P. 356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.01.037
  28. 28. Liang M.K., Limo M.J., Sola-Rabada A. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2014. V. 26. № 14. P. 4119. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm501096p
  29. 29. Frankcombe T.J., Liu Y. // Chem. Mater. 2023. V. 35. № 14. P. 5468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c00801
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library