RAS PhysicsКристаллография Crystallography Reports

  • ISSN (Print) 0023-4761
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5510

Analysis of crystal structure of epitaxial nanoheterostructures with multiple pseudomorphic quantum wells {InхGa1–хAs/GaAs} on GaAs (100), (110) AND (111) )А substrates

PII
S0023476125010184-1
DOI
10.31857/S0023476125010184
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 70 / Issue number 1
Pages
133-140
Abstract
The crystal structure of {In0.1Ga0.9As/GaAs} × 10 and {In0.2Ga0.8As/GaAs} × 10 epitaxial multilayer films on GaAs substrates with different orientations has been studied (100), (110), (111)A in order to identify features that may be related to the previously discovered increased efficiency of terahertz radiation generation in films with orientations (110) and (111)A. Significant concentrations of twins and package defects were found in films on non-standard GaAs (110) and (111)A substrates. The composition and thicknesses of individual layers of heterostructures on GaAs (100) substrates have been refined by analyzing thickness fluctuations on diffraction reflection curves.
Keywords
Date of publication
14.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
69

References

  1. 1. Naftaly M., Vieweg N., Deninger A. // Sensors. 2019. V. 19. P. 4203. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/s19194203
  2. 2. Consolino L., Bartalini S., De Natale P. // J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves. 2017. V. 38. P. 1289.
  3. 3. Hafez H.A., Chai X., Ibrahim A. et al. // J. Opt. 2016. V. 18. P. 093004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/18/9/093004
  4. 4. Dhillon S.S., Vitiello M.S., Linfield E.H. et al. // J. Phys. D. 2017. V. 50. P. 043001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/50/4/043001
  5. 5. Krotkus A. // J. Phys. D. 2010. V. 43. P. 273001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/43/27/273001
  6. 6. Burford N.M., El-Shenawee M.O. // Opt. Eng. 2017. V. 56. P. 010901. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.1.010901
  7. 7. Apostolopoulos V., Barnes M.E. // J. Phys. D. 2014. V. 47. P. 374002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/37/374002
  8. 8. Castro-Camus E., Alfaro M. // Photon. Res. 2016. V. 4. P. A36. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.4.000A36
  9. 9. Ilg M., Ploog K.H., Trampert A. // Phys. Rev. B. 1994. V. 50. № 23. P. 17111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17111
  10. 10. Климов Е.А., Клочков А.Н., Солянкин П.М. и др. // Квантовая электроника. 2024. Т. 54. № 1. С. 43.
  11. 11. Шик А.Я. Сверхрешетка // Большая российская энциклопедия: научно-образовательный портал. https://bigenc.ru/c/sverkhreshiotka-a2f3e5/?v=5490666
  12. 12. Yerino Christopher D., Liang Baolai, Huffaker Diana L. et al. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 2017. V. 35. P. 010801. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4972049
  13. 13. Климов Е.А., Пушкарев С.С., Клочков А.Н. и др. // Микроэлектроника. 2023. Т. 52. № 3. С. 167. https://doi.org/10.31857/S054412692370031X
  14. 14. Климов Е.А., Пушкарев С.С., Клочков А.Н. // Нано- и микросистемная техника. 2022. Т. 24. № 6. С. 283. https://doi.org/10.17587/nmst.24.283-287
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library